Home

Slouching · Towards · Bethlehem


It's that time again.

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · User Info

* * *
Those yahoos (in the Swiftian sense) at San Jose State have posted the results of the Bulwer-Lytton Contest, so I have to continue my (likely Quixotic) effort to defend the man. The following is the appendix to my Encyclopedia of Fantastic Victoriana:

In his lifetime Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton, 1st Baron of Knebworth (1803-1873) was a popular, prolific, and influential writer. But thanks to the vagaries of time and changing literary tastes Bulwer-Lytton’s name has become synonymous with bad writing, to the point that the English department of San Jose State University has, since 1982, held the "Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest" for the "opening sentence of the worst of all possible novels." The decline in Bulwer-Lytton’s reputation is at least somewhat understandable, as many aspects of his style have not aged well. Bulwer-Lytton’s work can be stiff, wooden, and melodramatic. He often unsuccessfully strains for affect. He had a fatal weakness for prolixity, fustian, and bombast. He is little-read today.

But Bulwer-Lytton deserves better. Never mind that he wrote in the style of his era, and that to single him out for writing like his contemporaries is unjust. Never mind that other writers who are his stylistic inferiors are not targeted so; no sober critic would read Walter Scott or Fenimore Cooper, and then read Bulwer-Lytton, and declare that Bulwer-Lytton is more deserving of derision. Never mind that, as Jaime Weinman says, "It was a dark and stormy night" isn’t really that bad. (I can find several opening lines in Dickens that are worse).

Bulwer-Lytton deserves praise and admiration. Few writers, of any time or of any country, were as influential during their lifetimes. Few writers possessed his commercial instincts or had as great an insight into the tastes of the reading audience. And few writers were as consistently experimental over as long a period of time. The following is a summary of his accomplishments:

Pelham (1828) was the most popular and influential of the Silver Fork genre of novels. The Silver Fork (or "fashionable novel") genre described the improper behavior of the aristocratic set, as told to the public by (supposedly) one of the aristocrats themselves. The Silver Fork novel was popular from the 1820s until the 1840s and was the transitional genre between the novel of the upper classes and the domestic realism of the Victorian novel proper. Pelham made the fortune of the publishing firm of Colburn and Co. and may have been the best-selling novel of the 19th century. Pelham also set the style, still the standard today, for men wearing black evening dress rather than blue.
Paul Clifford (1830) and Eugene Aram (1832) were the first two major Newgate novels and essentially established the genre. Neither novel was quite as popular as William Harrison Ainsworth’s Rookwood, but both novels were successful (and scandalous), and Rookwood and the succeeding Newgate novels would not have been written without Bulwer-Lytton’s precedent.
The Last Days of Pompeii (1834) was not Bulwer-Lytton’s first historical novel (the undistinguished Devereux (1829) was), but it was his first success in the genre. It is the best historical novel of the 1830s and was seen by critics as having topped the work of Sir Walter Scott. Bulwer-Lytton followed Pompeii with Rienzi, the Last of the Roman Tribunes (1835), The Last of the Barons (1843), and Harold, the Last of the Saxon Kings (1848). Scott deserves credit for the creation of the modern historical novel, but Bulwer-Lytton’s historical novels were among the most popular in the genre in the 1830s and 1840s, and The Last Days of Pompeii created the subgenre of historical novels set in Rome, a group which would later include Walter Pater’s Marius the Epicurian (1885) and Lewis Wallace’s Ben Hur (1880). Bulwer-Lytton’s historical novels set the standard for applying scholarship and research to the writing of historical romances, and The Last of the Barons and Harold were among the first historical novels to apply contemporary social political issues to the past: in Barons, the negative effect of the Industrial Revolution on England; in Harold, the question of what it is to be "English" and a celebration of the romantic Toryism of the Young England movement of the early 1840s.
England and the English (1834) was an important criticism of English culture which was politically radical in its call for education and child labor reform.
Athens: Its Rise and Fall (1837) is one of the best and most readable Victorian histories of ancient Greece.
Ernest Maltravers (1837) is the novel in which the influence of the Germans on Bulwer-Lytton is the most pronounced. Bulwer-Lytton was greatly influenced by the German thinkers and writers, Goethe and Schiller especially, and he translated Schiller’s lyrical poetry and wrote essays on Wieland, Lessing, Herder, and Klopstock. Bulwer-Lytton admired and liked the Germans and helped spread an appreciation for German thought among the English, and in Ernest Maltravers Bulwer-Lytton did a passable attempt at emulating Goethe.
Night and Morning (1841), another of Bulwer-Lytton’s Proto-Mysteries, was reviewed by Edgar Allan Poe in the same issue of Graham’s Lady’s and Gentleman’s Magazine in which appeared Poe’s "The Murders in the Rue Morgue," Poe’s first C. Auguste Dupin story. Though not wholly complimentary of Bulwer-Lytton, Poe nonetheless praises Night and Morning’s plot construction. Poe probably did not read Night and Morning before he composed "The Murders in the Rue Morgue," but it is likely that the complicated plot of Night and Morning had some effect on Poe’s composition of "The Mystery of Marie Roget" and "The Purloined Letter." Moreover, Night and Morning’s detective Monsieur Favart, though an imitation of Eugène François Vidocq, is an early example in crime fiction of the police detective character. Both Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins knew of Night and Morning, and it is arguable that Favart was an influence on Dickens’ creation of Inspector Bucket (in Bleak House) and on Collins’ creation of Sergeant Cuff (in The Moonstone). The mystery genre would be different without the example of the Newgate novels to draw upon. The mystery genre would not exist without the work of Poe, Dickens, and Collins, all three of whom were influenced by Bulwer-Lytton.
Zanoni (1842) and A Strange Story (1861-1862) created the occult fantasy genre. Bulwer-Lytton had predecessors, including William Beckford (in Vathek), but it was Bulwer-Lytton, Zanoni and A Strange Story which were influential on and imitated by later writers of occult fantasy.
The Caxtons (1849) was not the first major domestic novel–-Thackeray’s Vanity Fair (1847) has that honor–-but Bulwer-Lytton’s prestige (by the mid-point of the century Bulwer-Lytton was seen as England’s leading novelist) gave significant impetus to domestic fiction and helped make it fashionable.
The Haunted and the Haunters (1859) was the first modern haunted house story. It is set in the London of the day and uses psychic phenomena rather than the rationalized supernatural of the Gothics. The Haunted and the Haunters has been imitated dozens of times and is one of the two or three most influential haunted house stories ever written.
The Coming Race (1871) was multiply influential. It is a significant early work of science fiction and uses concepts which would become standards in science fiction, including a version of atomic energy in the vril force. The Coming Race is the best-written of the 19th century Hollow Earth novels and was influential on later utopian novels, including Samuel Butler’s Erewhon (1872). And the mystical vocabulary and ideology of The Coming Race were adopted by Helena Blavatsky and incorporated into the philosophy of Theosophy.

The preceding list does not include Bulwer-Lytton’s work (1831-1833) as an editor on the New Monthly Review, one of the most popular of the monthly fictional magazines; his political career as a Member of Parliament (1831-1841, 1852-1866) and as Secretary of State for the Colonies (1858-1859); his satires, including The New Timon (1846), with its then-shocking attack on Tennyson, and Money (1840), which like England and the English retains its bite today; his great influence on modern occultism, including the Order of the Golden Dawn; his influence on other writers, particularly Dickens; his efforts on behalf of other writers, both toward creating effective copyright laws and, through the Guild of Literature and Art, to support struggling writers and artists; his extensive critical work on the theory of fiction; and his attempts to experiment with narrative structure and to expand the possibilities of contemporary fiction, especially in My Life (1853), in which the narrative is interrupted by criticisms from the characters.

The callow call Bulwer-Lytton "Barely Literate," and the annual "Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest" invites similarly shallow jibes, but Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton is as deserving of respect and appreciation as any other writer of his age.

Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry

* * *
[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 04:58 pm (UTC), [info]jonlaw commented:
I wish you well on your quest. It is hard to dislodge narrow minded academic knee-jerk activity. I'm sure their response would range from "it's all in fun" to a reductionist view of the man's career as you have outlined (Barely Literate, etc.). Neither response, in light of the evidence you marshal, holds water. However, Once something has set down roots, particularly as say, an academic tradition (one that will get play on intellectual forums like NPR (which don't get me wrong, I listen to all the time)) it is hard to dislodge the biased, unsupported, notions of the received knowledge, no matter how open and inquiring the academy was supposed to make our scholars and academics.

Again, good luck, because those are some entrenched windmills.

[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 05:01 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Thanks. My quest is indeed Quixotic, made more futile because a) I'm beneath the academics' notice and b) the folks who are going to post links to the Contest will either ignore me or, more likely, will never read my rebuttal.

I'll keep trying, though, buoyed by the knowledge that Bulwer-Lytton is in the canon and the reference books, and always will be, while the nobodies behind the Contest are not and will never be.

* * *
[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 05:25 pm (UTC), [info]ffutures commented:
I quite enjoyed The Coming Race, it's on my web site (in Microsoft Reader .lit format only at present, I shall have to add HTML) here:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/forgottenfutures/crace.lit
[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 05:28 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
It hasn't dated nearly as badly as one would expect, I think, and is much more advanced sf than anything else being written at the time.
* * *
[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 05:53 pm (UTC), [info]desperance commented:
Yay. Thanks for this.

A couple of years ago I was shown around Knebworth by his great-(great?)-grandson. He may have had a fatal weakness for gothic embellishment, in architecture as in prose (the original house was a Tudor mansion of absolute quality; subsequent inhabitants had added to the property, as is only proper; he, um, embellished it. With gargoyle water-spouts and such. You can read his house like a book. One of his); nevertheless, I came away with a much-increased respect for the man. (Also, the current generation is not lacking in humour; they are very aware of the contest, and not at all defensive about it.)

[User Picture]
On June 30th, 2009 06:00 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Some day I'll get to Knebworth. Some day. And good for the descendants for not being defensive.
* * *
[User Picture]
On July 1st, 2009 01:37 am (UTC), [info]ysidro commented:
Hear, hear!
* * *
[User Picture]
On July 1st, 2009 03:14 pm (UTC), [info]rikibeth commented:
Pelham also set the style, still the standard today, for men wearing black evening dress rather than blue.


Wait a minute, I'd always heard the origin of that fashion custom attributed to Beau Brummel, just like the unbuttoned bottom button of the waistcoat.
[User Picture]
On July 1st, 2009 03:21 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Nope--BL gets the credit for that one, although most of what is credited to Beau Brummel belongs to Brummel.
On July 1st, 2009 03:24 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) replied:
just like the unbuttoned bottom button of the waistcoat.


Albert the Prince-Consort buttoned the bottom button, while his son Edward VII unbuttoned it due to his girth, thereby setting the mode.

--mds
* * *
On July 1st, 2009 03:33 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented:
I strongly suspect that much of the modern-day picking on Lord Lytton comes from:

(1) Snoopy's repeated use of "It was a dark and stormy night" in his objectively poor writing, and

(2) the fact that his name is "Bulwer-Lytton," which is intrinsically more humorous than "Ainsworth" or "Scott."

Neither of these is fair, but teasing so rarely is.

(Also, Swiftian yahoos? I hope the contest organizers have slightly better hygiene than that. Though it is Silicon Valley.)

--mds

[User Picture]
On July 1st, 2009 03:43 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Yes, Swiftian yahoos--they're academics, hygiene & professional attire isn't a high priority.
[User Picture]
On July 3rd, 2009 09:25 pm (UTC), [info]pecunium replied:
Actually... all of the lines of Snoopy's book are cribbed from Bulwer-Lytton.

He gets a bad rap, mostly I think because of the name (as you say). He wrote turgidly, but so did they all.

On an objective level, "It was a dark and stormy night" is a pretty strong opening.

Just ask L'Engle.

* * *
On July 1st, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented:
I enjoyed Last Of The Barons enough that, back when I was trying to sell movie scripts in the 1990's, the idea of trying to adapt LOTB as a screenplay was on my list of possible projects. (Alas, aside from my one television script for ST:TNG, my fantabulous screenwriting career eventually went down in flames.)

-- Bruce Arthurs

[User Picture]
On July 1st, 2009 04:31 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Good choice for an adaptation! I think his historical work is worth revisiting for tv or movies.

I'm surprised you didn't get more work based on your TNG script--that's one of the best episodes of the series.

* * *
[User Picture]
On July 2nd, 2009 12:59 pm (UTC), [info]supergee commented:
The Bulwer-Lytton contest has long since become a tiresome parody of itself, and I'm linking to this post as part of my annual mockery of it.
[User Picture]
On July 2nd, 2009 03:38 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Excellent!
* * *
[User Picture]
On July 2nd, 2009 02:04 pm (UTC), [info]dd_b commented:
Thanks, now I know more about the man and his fiction than I did before.
[User Picture]
On July 2nd, 2009 03:37 pm (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.
* * *
[User Picture]
On July 5th, 2009 01:25 am (UTC), [info]bookworm1225 commented:
This is late, and I don't know if you'll see it, but...

What is your opinion of the writing of Amanda McKittrick Ros? I recently stumbled on this website, and was...amazed, to say the least. *grin*

[User Picture]
On July 5th, 2009 02:12 am (UTC), [info]ratmmjess replied:
Unfamiliar with her, but obviously need to investigate further. Thanks for the pointer!
[User Picture]
On July 6th, 2009 04:37 pm (UTC), [info]bookworm1225 replied:
You're welcome!
* * *

Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry